Assessment of Left Ventricle Systolic Function by Strain Imaging in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Dr Jaymala Mishra DrNB*1, Dr Sushil kumar Pathak M.D 2, Dr Amit Varshney DrNB 3, Dr. Soumitra Kumar DM 4, Dr Anup Khetan DNB 5, Dr Debika Chatterji M.D 6
*Correspondence to: Dr. Jaymala Mishra. Rabindranath Tagore International Institute of Cardiac Sciences, 124, Mukundapur, E. M. Bypass, Kolkata – 700099.
© 2023 Dr. Jaymala Mishra. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons AttributionLicense, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the originalwork is properly cited.
Received: 26 July 2023
Published: 10 August 2023
Abstract
Background: Contrary to the popular belief that there is no systolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is subnormal in HFPEF. The ability of GLS to predict cardiovascular outcome may be superior to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as it detects myocardial dysfunction. It will reflect that LVEF has the limited ability to assess the systolic function of ventricles and it will also determine its clinical significance which is poorly understood. LV strain in the long axis uses global longitudinal strain (GLS) calculated as the average from all segments as a global LV function. The positive strain means elongation whereas negative strain is shortening. In 2Dimensional STE, only two directions of strain can be measured at anytime. Normal GLS for most echocardiography system is between-18-25% in healthy individuals. It will reflect that LVEF has the limited ability to assess the systolic function of ventricles and it will also determine its clinical significance which is poorly understood. It is a observational cross sectional study with assessment of left ventricle systolic function by strain imaging in patients with heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. LVEF has the limited ability to assess the systolic function of ventricles and it will also determine its clinical significance which is poorly understood.
AIMS and OBJECTIVES:
Primary Objectives: Assessment of left ventricle systolic function by Strain imaging in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Secondary objectives:
>50%, <55%.
Method: Patients were above the age of 18 years with signs of functional/structural causes of heart failure ,symptoms and signs consistent with heart failure preserved ejection fraction of > 50 % by Echocardiography, and /or elevated natriuretic peptides BNP> 35 pg/ml and/or NT-proBNP >125 pg/mL and
Echocardiography features of HFPEF with at least one additional criteria relevant structural heart disease (LVH and or LAE ) as a sign of increase filling pressure and diastolic dysfunction on echocardiography, will be taken into the study. LV function was assessed by Modified Simpson's Biplane method from two standard apical four and two chamber views. The left atrial (LA) volume will be measured by the biplane area length method using apical 4-and 2- camber views at the end systolic frame . The maximal volume of the LA, measured at end-systole from bi-plane and indexed to body surface area [left atrial volume index (LAVI)] is calculated. TR jet velocity was calculated from apical four chamber view by estimation of peak RV systolic pressure from TR velocity and LA volume.
Strain e(t) in the myocardium can be measured by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). ECG gated cine loops of Apical 4, 3 and 2 chamber was acquired for offline analysis using PHILIPS aCMQ QApp “Automated Cardiac Motion Quantification (aCMQ) with zero click technology”. Once desirable tracking was achieved Global Longitudinal Strain was calculated by averaging the strain in all. Cut Off:< -18 considered abnormal.
Result: In this study there has been increase in abnormal value of GLS was found as age advances though p value is not significant. One fourth of patients has a body mass index
≥30kg/m2. Diabetesmellitus patients were 61.9%, while arterial hypertension were 82.5%.10% HFpEF patients had from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 20% of patients had chronic kidney disease. Among patients EF< 55%, 70% had abnormal GLS and EF>55% 58.57% had abnormal GLS, though p value is not significant. Abnormal GLS have significantly lower LVEF.
Conclusion: It seems clearly, GLS is an early, reliable and sensitive marker of LV systolic function in HFpEF even in persons with apparently normal LVEF. It can be used as a prognostic marker in follow up of the patient with normal LVEF. It is a very common dreadful and treatable condition, so earlier diagnosis will lead to better outcome. It is very promising method to identify patients with mild systolic dysfunction which is not reflected in EF. In fact it seems to be superior to all other parameters of echocardiography.
Heart Failure is a clinical syndrome characterized by typical symptoms (e.g. breathlessness, ankle swelling and fatigue) that may be accompanied by signs (e.g. elevated jugular venous pressure, pulmonary crackles and peripheral oedema) caused by a structural and/or functional cardiac abnormality, resulting in a reduced cardiac output and/ or elevated intracardiac pressures at rest or during stress[1]. It is a progressive disorder in which signs and symptoms of heart failure (HF) are apparent and it is progressive despite normal ejection fraction.
Definition of HFpEF is symptom and sign (signs may not be present in the early stages of HFpEF and in patients treated with diuretics) of heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)>=50% classified as “heart failure with preserved ejection fraction” (HFpEF)1 and elevated level of natiuretics polypeptide i.e, BNP 35 pg/ml and/or NT-proBNP 125 pg/mL and atleast one additional criteria:
A number of epidemiological studies conducted since the millennium have shown that around 50 % of heart failure patients have a normal ejection fraction [2,3]. The silent and progressive nature contributes to increase risk of death even with normal ejection fraction. HF symptoms reduce the quality of life, leading to repeated hospital admissions for symptom management although the survival after diagnosis has improved with time, mortality is high 50% over 5 years. HFpEF patients has multiple co- morbidities and prognosis is as ominous as systolic HF.
More than half of HFpEF patients with an LVEF >50% has reduced GLS. Strain rate should provide us opportunity to explore more about HFpEF and its events, so its relationship is explored more. GLS has been found to be an independent predictor of mortality in patients of heart failure not in atrial fibrillation. It was found to be superior to all other parameters of echocardiograhy[4]. Some small studies by Hasselberg et al show GLS has a good correlation with exercise capacity in heart failure patients with both reduced and preserved LV function[5]
Review of Literature
Despite major breakthroughs in the field of cardiology, HF remains a source of significant morbidity and mortality[6]. With the available lines of treatment we have achieved insignificant increases in prolongation of life with some amount of amelioration of symptoms. Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is defined as the acute and gradual progression of heart failure symptoms necessitating hospital care[10, 11, 12,13].
In the year 2005, staging of heart failure was introduced by the ACC/AHA (American College of Cardiology, /American Heart Association). The 4 stages of Heart failure are enumerated as A) patients with risk factors B) with structural heart disease alone C) with heart failure symptoms and D) end stage disease[17]. First encounters with these heart failure patients are when they are already in Stage C and above. At this stage the best of therapies available in our armamentarium have only feeble effects on the rate of disease progression so these patients need to be screened, evaluated and treated early. The hallmark of HF is exercise intolerance as evidenced by shortness of breath and dyspnea on exertion. It is a part of the definition of heart failure and is intricately linked to the underlying pathophysiology. The capacity to exercise is often limited in milder forms of heart failure. Here although the cardiac output may be adequate at rest, it becomes overwhelmingly inadequate even with mild exertion. Decreased exercise capacity is well correlated with poor outcomes and increased morbidity and mortality[18, 19].
Patients are more likely to be hospitalized and die from non cardiovascular cause than patient with reduced ejection fraction (EF) reflecting their advanced age, greater burden of comorbidites and systemic inflammation as they have a high prevalence of non-cardiac comorbidities[31].
Risk Factors and Comorbidities (Fig: 1)
The prevalence of HFpEF increases with age in both sexes[152], it is due to increase comorbidity. LV Diastolic function directly influences some of the pathophysiological mechanisms behind HFpEF. Aging is also linked with an increase in arterial stiffness and a reduction in endothelium-dependent vasodilation[7, 8, 150]. Arterial LV systolic and LV diastolic stiffness increases with aging, there is increase in cardiomyocytes size, apoptosis, decrease in cardiomyocytes number, alter growth factor regulation, focal collagen deposition, blunted beta adrenergic responsiveness, increased transforming growth factor ß signaling reduced expression of elastases leading to interstitial fibrosis, mitochondria oxidative stress, genomic instability, excitation contraction coupling, altered calcium handling protein leading to altered calcium handling[154], LV stiffness which increases progressively with age, and this increase is more prominent in women[153].
Female:
Both epidemiological studies and randomized trials consistently showed that most HFpEF patients are women (50–84%)[155]. This sex bias can partly be attributed to the age distribution of the population at risk as women have a higher life expectancy. LV stiffness increases progressively with age, and this increase is more prominent in women.
Obesity, arterial hypertension, and diabetes mellitus are common in HFpEF patients and often coexist[156]. Arterial hypertension increases cardiac structural remodelling and functional changes which increases afterload on the LV, further increasing pro-hypertrophic signalingn in cardiomyocytes. It directly impaires ventricular-vascular coupling[15] and leads to arterial stiffness[161], increases LV systolic and LV diastolic stiffness[17], impaires relaxation. Proinflammatory and profibrotic signal leads to monocyte-macrophage mediated changes in ECM collagen homeostasis and myofilament phosphorylation of cardomyocytes causes increase myocardial fibrosis and titin phosphorylation which increases myocardial stiffness.
Diabetes mellitus:
Diabetes mellitus can contribute to the development of HFpEF through several pathways. It is associated with a systemic inflammatory state and increased oxidative stress, causing microvascular dysfunction and LV hypertrophy[158]. Diabetes accelerates atherosclerosis, leading to myocardial ischemia, progressively impairing renal function, contributing to volume overload. Diabetic heart has myocyte hypertrophy, intramyocardial microangiopathy and ECM fibrosis causing impaired endothelium function, endothelium dependant and independent vasodilatation, impaired LV relaxation, impaired passive LV diastolic stiffness and contractile dysfunction. Microalbuminuria is highly prevalent in HFpEF, being associated with LV remodeling, and is a prognostic marker for further disease development[181, 194, 195, 199, 323]. Elevated circulating and cellular levels of advance glycosylated end prduct (AGEs) have been measured in patients with CKD [192]. It increases with increase collagen accumulation and stiffness due to impaired renal clearance of AGEs together with their increased formation resulting from oxidative stress. AGE-induces crosslinking of ECM proteins increases myocardial stiffness[160] which is linked to development and progression of both HFpEF and HFrEF[190] and correlated positively with increased diastolic dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus type [133]. In the myocardium AGEs impair calcium handling in cardiomyocytes[329] which is mediated by carbonylation of SERCA2a, which impairs its activity[330], as well as by enhancing calcium leakage from the sarcoplasmic reticulum through the ryanodine receptor (RyR2), thereby promoting mitochondrial damage and oxidative stress[159]. Hence, reducing production and enhancing breakdown of AGEs could be a therapeutic option in HFpEF patients [183], particularly in patients with diabetes and CKD[17].
Obesity: Obesity is defined as a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Patients with HF who have a BMI between 30 and 35 kg/m2 have lower mortality and hospitalization rates than those with a BMI in the normal range[66]. Obesity is a risk factor for HF [141]. The diagnosis of cardiac cachexia independently predicts a worse prognosis [65]. Morbidly obese (BMI 35–45 kg/m2) patients may have worse outcomes compared with patients within the normal weight range and those who are obese. In more advanced obesity weight loss may be considered to manage symptoms and exercise capacity [165]. Arising from a systemic inflammatory state and increased oxidative stress, they have impaired endothelial function [23]. It is a potent inductor of inflammatory signaling as visceral adipose tissue is infiltrated by macrophages, which continuously secrete inflammatory cytokines [63] leading to an increase plasma volume, correlating with LV end-diastolic pressure [119]. It increases metabolic and haemodynamic load on heart. Obesity influences LV geometry substantially more in women than in men- adipose mass is greater in women than men in any weight category and obese women have greater LV mass than obese men.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Poor lung function is a risk factor for congestive heart failure (CHF), low FEV1 is associated with incident Heart failure (HF) and increases risk of hospitalization due to HF. HFpEF is in 5% of patients with more in older patients and subclinical diastolic dysfunction is there in 75% of COPD. Coronary ischemia with atherosclerosis is associated with diastolic dysfunction (Fig: 1).
Heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) co-exist, and it is estimated that about 50% of HF patients suffer from CKD characterized by impaired relaxation of the left ventricle (LV) during diastole. These patients have typical co-existence of HFpEF and CKD is partially due to common underlying comorbidities, such as hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes (Fig: 1). Multiple processes including cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, interstitial fibrosis, impaired calcium handling, and increased passive cardiomyocyte stiffness contribute to the left ventricular stiffening characteristic for HFpEF. Macrovascular changes accompanying CKD, such as hypertension and arterial stiffening, can contribute to HFpEF (Fig: 2)[137, 136]. Interdependence of the heart and kidneys, similarities between their microvascular networks, and the coexistence of CKD and HF play a role for microvascular dysfunction in development and progression of both diseases ,they are mutually promoting (Fig: 1). HFpEF promotes renal dysfunction by (1) an elevated central venous pressure, which results from pulmonary hypertension and RV dysfunction (2) inability to increase cardiac output following arterial vasodilation because of chronotropic incompetence and fixed LV stroke volume (3) systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and low NO bioavailability, low erythropoietin and Vitamin D which reduces renal blood flow and sodium excretion [17] renal factors having a direct impact on the heart and/ or coronary microvasculature, these factors include: (1) activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (2) anemia, (3) hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia and increased levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23)151, (4) uremic toxins.
CKD can induce coronary microvascular dysfunction and progression of left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction by mechanical effects, neurohumoral activation, systemic inflammation, anemia and changes in metabolism as induced by CKD. Arterial remodeling in CKD patients is characterized by arterial stiffening, increasing pulse pressure, as a consequence of premature aging, and atherosclerosis of the arteries[17].
Myocardial perfusion is also impaired by the vasoconstrictor effects of angiotensin II. During prolonged exercise, vasoconstriction occurs within metabolically less active tissues, mediated by angiotensin II and endothelin-1. Such response is inhibited in metabolically active tissues by NO and prostanoids, resulting in an efficient distribution of blood[147]. In a state of systemic inflammation, locally decreased NO bioavailability in the coronary microvasculature results in disinhibition of angiotensin II-mediated vasoconstriction, resulting in reduced blood delivery to the heart.
Aldosterone has been shown to directly promote myocardial fibrosis, left ventricular hypertrophy, and coronary microvascular dysfunction, acting through endothelial and myocardial mineralocorticoid receptors, independently of angiotensin II[146].
Pulmonary hypertension: HFpEF patients have increase pulmonary artery systolic pressure >40 mmhg due to elevated LV filling resulting increase in pulmonary venous filling pressure, increases reactive pulmonary vasoconstriction which increases pulmonary vascular resistance which is augmented in exercise. In some increase pulmonary venous filling pressure causes pulmonary vascular remodelling causes irreversible pulmonary hypertension.
Anemia and Iron Deficiency: Iron deficiency is the most frequent cause of anemia in HF patients, predict mortality its role in erythropoiesis. Iron is also a key factor in mitochondrial metabolism, crucial for cells with a high energy consumption such as cardiac and skeletal myocytes. In HF, iron deficiency arises from nutritional defects, increased red cell destruction, hepatic congestion, inflammatory bone marrow dysfunction, and chronic kidney disease. Iron deficiency affects functional status exercise capacity, it directly affect microvascular function by inhibiting mitochondrial respiration, cardiomyocyte damage, eventually contributes to progression of HFpEF (Fig: 3), by limiting energy production, impairing energy-dependent Ca2+reuptake during diastole[118] and contributes to oxidative stress.It impairs oxygen-carrying capacity, and the severity of anemia predicts mortality, but the role of treatment is uncertain[35].
Sleep apnoea syndrome: The pathophysiological interaction between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cardiovascular disease is complex and comprises sympathetic activation, inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction. Both OSA and central sleep apnea (CSA) is present in 60% of heart failure patients with OSA predominant in HFPEF patients. CPAP for obstructive sleep apnea was effective in decreasing the apnea−hypopnea index, improving nocturnal oxygenation, increasing LVEF, lowering norepinephrine levels, and increasing the distance walked in 6 minutes, these benefits were sustained for up to 2 years [228]. Smaller studies suggest that CPAP can improve cardiac function, sympathetic activity, and health related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with HF and obstructive sleep apnea[226, 229]. Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is a common form of diastolic dysfunction due to chronic pressure overload, impaired coronary flow reserve and inflammation leading to cardiac interstitial fibrosis. LV mass and LV mass volume ratio increases in proportion of severity of SDB. Indices of diastolic dysfunction, increase E/A ratio, reduced mitral deceleration, isovolumetric relaxation are there in SDB. SDB independently predicts new onset heart failure. In patients with heart failure SDB predicts HF exacerbations, and progression, impaired quality of life, increase fatigue, reduced functional status, frequent hospitalization, arrhythmia and death. CPAP treatment reduces BP, improve oxygenation, subendocardial ischemia, the preload, afterload, sympathetic activation, inflammatory and oxidative stress (Fig: 4).
Atrial Fibrillation and Rhythm disturbances: Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a frequent cause of decompensation in HFPEF, causing loss of atrial contraction and resulting tachycardia. AF causes decompensation in diastolic dysfunction resulting in left atrial enlargement (LAE) and AF. The presence of one increases the likelihood of the other and each can cause the other[48]. As suggested in the 2013 ACC/AHA HF guidelines, AF is managed in patients with HFpEF according to guidelines to improve symptomatic HF[44]. The ef?cacy of successful restoration and long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm is dependent in part on how long a patient has been in persistent AF and left atrial size. Rate control to prevent rapid AF acutely and/or chronically usually leads to an improvement in symptoms in patients with HF and marked improvement in left ventricular function. Beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, Digoxin are drugs to be used[17]. Anticoagulation drug use to prevent systemic embolization.
Coronary artery disease: In coronary artery disease (CAD) acute ischaemia contributes to diastolic dysfunction causes change in endothelium vascular function which contributes to HFpEF. CAD is common in patients with HFpEF[36]. In general, contemporary revascularization guidelines should be used in the care of patients with HFpEF and concomitant CAD. It might be reasonable to consider revascularization in patients for whom ischemia appears to contribute to HF symptoms, but whether these interventions improve outcomes is not entirely clear[112, 113].
Genetic Regulation: Cardiomyopathy hypertrophic/restrictive/ infiltrative. Little is known about potential genetic determinants of HFpEF. Some genetic cardiomyopathies do exhibit a phenotype with preserved ejection fraction like hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. It is difficult to discern genetic determinants of HFpEF from the influence of comorbidities.
Constrictive Pericarditis: The normal pericardium restrains ventricular ?lling, contributing to the elevation in intracardiac pressures that develop during conditions of increased venous return such as exercise. Patients with HFpEF characteristically develop marked increases in ?lling pressures with exercise or volume loading owing to diastolic dysfunction[6]. Further study to determine whether pericardial restraint contributes to the pathophysiology of HFpEF, whether surgical approaches to remove pericardial restraint might improve symptoms related to venous congestion[25].
Valvular heart disease: If a catheter-based therapy is being considered it may be particularly beneficial in patients with HF being considered for surgery, transcatheter aortic valve implantation or transcatheter mitral valve intervention.
1.Cardiomyocyte contractile function:
The (giant) elastic sarcomeric protein titin is the dominant regulator of myocardial passive tension, and cardiomyocyte-derived stiffness (Fig: 5). 80% of left ventricular passive stiffness may be explained by titin, especially when sarcomere lengths are still within physiological boundaries, while in overstretched sarcomeres the contribution of the extracellular matrix becomes more dominant[35]. Titin regulates cardiomyocyte stiffness at the transcriptional and post-translational levels. At the transcriptional level, titin shifts from its compliant isoform N2BA toward its stiff isoform N2B have been postulated to contribute to diastolic dysfunction in HFpEF. Post-translational modi?cation of the titin N2B segment by protein kinase A (PKA)- and G (PKG) mediated phosphorylation has been shown to change cardiomyocyte passive tension (fig: 7). In cardiomyocytes, the giant protein titin operates as a bidirectional spring and gives stability to the other myofilaments. Titin determines the sarcomeric viscoelasticity, where as actin and myosin mainly contribute to force generation[32, 33, 34]. Mechanical energy stored in the sarcomeric protein titin during contraction contributes to recoil during relaxation, resting cardiomyocyte tension in diastole is a determinant of contractile force during systole. The relationship between “systolic” and “diastolic” function at the cellular level is expected to be highly interdependent. Titin-dependent stiffness is increased in patients with arterial hypertension and HFpEF, supporting its mechanistic role. Prominent features of myocardial remodeling in heart failure with HFpEF are high cardiomyocyte resting tension (Fpassive) and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.Titin is able to modulate cardiomyocyte-based F passive by means of isoform switching, phosphorylation and oxidative modifications. Phosphorylation and oxidative modifications occur much faster. For HFpEF, the relative hypophosphorylation of PKG-dependent titin sites, offers potential therapeutic targets. This increases passive stiffness (Fpassive) upon stretch correlates with LV end- diastolic pressures and LV diastolic stiffness caused by changes in both ECM fibrillar collagen and cardiomyocyte titin. They also had increased titin dependent stiffness in association with significant changes in the phosphorylation state of titin, with decreased phosphorylation of a PKA/PKG site in the N2B element and increased phosphorylation of one of the PKC sites in the PEVK element[35]. Sites within the N2B element are phosphorylated by PKA and PKG, which decreases passive force. Sites within the PEVK element are phosphorylated by PKCα which increases passive force, hyperphosphorylation of the PKC/ calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) site in the PEVK segment S4185(S469) of the N2B element is associated with increased myocardial stiffness in HFpEF patients[51].
The current study showed hypophosphorylation of PKG/PKA sites on titin in HFpEF patients, consistent with the reduction in passive tension detected when cardiomyocytes from HFpEF patients are treated with PKA/PKG. The finding that both changes in collagen and titin may play a pivotal role in the development of HFpEF[35].
One of the mechanisms necessary for relaxation to occur is the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATP- ase (SERCA) pump, which removes calcium from the cytosol. Decreased levels or activity of SERCA can decrease the removal of calcium from the cytosol, which impairs relaxation of the ventricles. Several factors can affect the SERCA pump[16] like Ischemia, pathological LVH secondary to hypertension and aortic stenosis. There is a naturally occurring SERCA inhibitory protein called phosphlamban and increased levels of this protein impair relaxation.Diastolic intracellular calcium handling is a major determinant of LV relaxation. Dephosphorylated phospholamban (PLN) is an inhibitor of sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)ATPase 2a (SERCA2a), but PKA-catalyzed (or CaMKII) phosphorylation of PLN results in the dissociation of PLN from SERCA2a, thus activating this Ca2+ pump and augmenting SERCA2a activity. In failing hearts, Ca2+ reuptake into the sarcoplasmic reticulum by the SERCA pump is delayed. Cardiomyocyte Ca2+ accumulation in the absence of concomitant enhancement of SERCA activity leads to elevated diastolic Ca2+, Ca 2+ transients with preserved or enhanced amplitude, and slower Ca2+ reuptake kinetics with impaired relaxation and promote remodeling. The inability of SERCA to expeditiously resequester Ca2+ becomes particularly explain the chronotropic intolerance of the myocardium and reduced exercise.
Generation of cAMP, which stimulates PKA activity. cGMP is generated from activation of sGC by NO. cGMP stimulates PKG activity. Both PKA and PKG induce lusitropic effects, and lower cardiomyocyte stiffness through phosphorylation of the titin N2B segment. Sites within the PEVK element are phosphorylated by PKCα[76].
Trials indicate that combining SERCA2a activation and Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA) inhibition may increase contractility and facilitate active relaxation, improving systolic as well as diastolic heart function, both of which would be bene?cial effects in the treatment of chronic HF.
Diastolic dysfunction cannot be observed by echocardiography at rest in one-third of patients with HFpEF as many patients with HFpEF in the early stages did not present an increase in LV ?lling pressure at rest. These patients usually have normal plasma levels of B natriuretic peptide (BNP), which leads clinicians to make a false diagnosis of no HF. Natriuretic peptides are released and produced in response to increased myocardial wall tension. HFpEF is characterized by hypertrophic hearts with a small LV cavity. Diastolic dysfunction in HFpEF does not appear to impair net LV ?lling.
Diastolic dysfunction cannot be observed by echocardiography at rest in one-third of patients with HFpEF as many patients with HFpEF in the early stages did not present an increase in LV ?lling pressure at rest. These patients usually have normal plasma levels of B natriuretic peptide (BNP), which leads clinicians to make a false diagnosis of no HF. Natriuretic peptides are released and produced in response to increased myocardial wall tension. HFpEF is characterized by hypertrophic hearts with a small LV cavity. Diastolic dysfunction in HFpEF does not appear to impair net LV ?lling, but this level of ?lling is at the expense of increased LA pressure which can lead to dyspnea, secondary pulmonary hypertension, and atrial remodeling, make patients prone to right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and atrial ?brillation.Abnormalities in patients with HFpEF are related to diastolic dysfunction and may present with impairments in relaxation, increases in chamber stiffness, or both. Increased cardiomyocyte stiffness and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy follows diastolic dysfunction and sets the chain reaction of pathologic maladaptation leading to overt HFpEF. Cardiomyocyte hypertrophy is an almost universal finding in human HFpEF. Comorbidities induce a systemic proin?ammatory state with elevated plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a, soluble ST2 (sST2), and pentraxin [3].Coronary microvascular endothelial cells reactively produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM), and E-selectin. Production of ROS leads to formation of peroxynitrite (ONOO) and reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, both of which lower soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) activity in adjacent cardiomyocytes.
NO-sGC-cGMP pathway: In the setting of cardiovascular risk factors (aging, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, and smoking), endothelial homeostasis is disturbed which causes Endothelial Dysfunction[149, 148]. It is considered the first step in the atherosclerotic process and a precursor to overt cardiovascular disease as it sets a vicious circle leads to a vasoconstricting, pro-inflammatory, and pro- thrombotic state. Inflammation and oxidative stress reduces nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability with subsequently less stimulation of soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC), sGC is the only receptor for nitric oxide (cNO), a signaling agent produced by the enzyme nitric oxide synthase (NOS) from the amino acid L-arginine, which catalyses the conversion of guanosine 5’-triphosphate (GTP) to cGMP.
Cardiomyocyte hypertrophy is an almost universal finding in HFpEF. It is additionally induced by molecular pathways, NO-mediated mechanisms, by increased stretch on cardiomyocytes through intrinsic mechanotransduction mechanisms. Cardiac biopsies from HFpEF patients show increased extracellular fibrosis. Extracellular fibrosis is physiologically more important than cardiomyocyte stiffness in HFpEF, as LV end-diastolic pressure is only correlated to collagen-based stiffness, not to titin-based stiffness (Fig: 8). Cardiac fibroblasts play a prominent role in the development of extracellular fibrosis. In HFpEF, fibroblasts are presumed to convert to myofibroblasts because of exposure to transforming growth factor-β as a result of monocyte/macrophage myocardial infiltration16. Circulating inflammatory cytokines induce expression of endothelial adhesion molecules such as vascular cell adhesion molecule and E-selectin (Fig: 10). Secretion of inflammatory mediators.
Angiotensin II and aldosterone induces extracellular fibrosis through direct stimulation of collagen secretion by myofibroblasts[107, 106]. The pro-inflammatory state in HFpEF is thought to be systemic as inflammatory endothelial activation is in the coronary circulation but present throughout the vasculature. A reduction in NO bioavailability reduces exercise - induced peripheral vasodilation, reduces vasoreactivity and vascular remodeling in the pulmonary arteries, reduces capillary density in the heart and skeletal muscle, and reduced renal blood flow. There is a higher relative importance of endothelial inflammation compared to endothelial dysfunction, in HFpEF pathophysiology. All these comorbidities can induce a systemic inflammatory state, potent inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) are elevated in HFpEF patients and predict new onset of HFpEF30. PKG activity as an important contributor to myocardial diastolic dysfunction in HFPEF. Lower myocardial PKG activity in HFPEF to correspond with higher cardiomyocyte Fpassive and in vitro administration of PKG acutely lowered the high Fpassive of HFPEF cardiomyocytes (Fig: 11). Prominent features of myocardial remodeling in HFPEF are cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis. It is essential to develop noninvasive biomarkers like CMR for early identification of the alterations in these two components. Clinical limitations of CMR include local expertise, lower availability and higher costs compared with echocardiography, uncertainty about safety in patients with metallic implants (including cardiac devices) and less reliable measurements in patients with tachyarrhythmias. Claustrophobia is an important limitation for CMR. Linear gadolinium based contrast agents are contraindicated in individuals with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30mL/min/1.73m2, because they may trigger nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (this may be less of a concern with newer cyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents)[108]. Oxidative stress leads to formation of disulfide bridges within the titin molecule, which raises its overall stiffness (Fig: 11) which may significantly contribute towards altered ventricular- vascular coupling. Prognosis is, equally grim as in HFrEF 5-year mortality is around 75%, which is worse than most cancers.