Volume 2 Issue 1

Non-motor Symptoms in Parkinsonism – A Study from a Tertiary Care Center in India

Kuljeet Singh Anand*, Vimlesh Kumar Verma1, Bhuwan Sharma2, Abhishek Juneja3, Mina Chandra4

 

1.Kuljeet Singh Anand - Professor, Department of Neurology, Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi

2.Vimlesh Kumar Verma - Professor, Department of Medicine, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, Safedabad, Lucknow

3.Bhuwan Sharma - Consultant Neurologist, Suyash Hospital, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Abhishek Juneja - Consultant Neurologist, Maharaja Agrasen Hospital, New Delhi

4.Mina Chandra - Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi Himank Goyal - Consultant Neurologist, Maharaja Agrasen Hospital, New Delhi


*Corresponding Author: Dr. Kuljeet Singh Anand, Professor, Department of Neurology, Dr RML Hopsital, New Delhi – 11000, India.


Received Date:  January 13, 2021

Publication Date:  February 01, 2021


Abstract
Background- Patients with Parkinsonism suffer from both motor and non-motor symptoms. Non-motor symptoms are difficult to recognize. Cognitive impairment, sleep and mood disorders are found to be associated with Parkinsonism. This study was conducted to assess the non-motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease and Parkinson plus syndromes.

Material and methods- Patients with Parkinson’s disease and Parkinson's plus syndrome were selected. The different scores for non-motor symptoms were assessed for all patients. These scores were compared between Parkinson’s disease and Parkinson's plus syndromes.

Results – A total of 60 patients were recruited, including 40 patients with Parkinson’s disease and 20 patients with Parkinson's plus syndrome. The pain was more significantly present in Parkinson’s disease whereas, autonomic symptoms were more significantly seen in Parkinson plus patients.

Conclusion – Non-motor symptoms are present in Parkinsonian syndromes. Timely identification and management are important for improving the quality of life.

Keywords: Non-motor dysfunction; Parkinson's disease, Parkinson plus syndromes.


Non-motor Symptoms in Parkinsonism – A Study from a Tertiary Care Center in India

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, after Alzheimer’s disease. (1) PD was described by James Parkinson in his classic ‘Essay on the Shaking Palsy’, in 1817. (2) The cardinal clinical features of PD include the asymmetric onset of bradykinesia, rigidity, and resting tremor. (3) In India alone, approximately 700 million people are above the age of 65 years, of which about 7 million suffer from PD. (4) James Parkinson also recognized the non-motor symptoms of PD, which referred to sleep disturbance, constipation, dysarthria, dysphonia, dysphagia, sialorrhea, and urinary incontinence in his ‘Essay on the shaking palsy’ in 1817. (2) Non-motor symptoms (NMS) in PD have been systematically described for the first time in 2006 by Chaudhuri et al. (5) The frequency of NMS increases along with the disease duration. (6) Disorders of mood and affect, though receiving less attention than motor aspects of the disease, have long been recognized as a part of PD. PD Dementia (PDD) is thus, increasingly more recognized and it has been revealed that PD is associated with characteristic dementia. Depression is common in PD, occurring in up to one-half of the patients.

Anxiety disorders may be as common as depression and the two are frequently co-existent. (7,8) Apathy, may overlap but is usually distinct from depression. Also, suicidal ideations, hallucinations, and delusions may occur. (9,10) Fatigue, sleepiness, and sleep disturbances are major problems, independent of any medication and motor disability. Autonomic dysfunction occurs prominently in PD. This can manifest as dysphagia, constipation, urinary urgency, incontinence, erectile dysfunction, orthostatic hypotension, dyshidrosis, and impaired thermoregulation. There are only a few reports about the frequency of non-motor symptoms in patients with PD from India and no such Indian report in patients with Parkinson plus syndrome. The present study aims to investigate the non-motor dysfunction of PD and Parkinson plus syndrome in Indian patients.


Methodology

The present cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the non-motor dysfunction in 60 patients with idiopathic PD and Parkinson plus syndrome attending the Movement disorder clinic at Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi, India. Adult patients with a diagnosis of Parkinsonism were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria included:

1.Systemic conditions known to be associated with autonomic dysfunction including diabetes, chronic alcoholism, chronic renal failure, chronic liver disease.

2. Patients with essential tremor

3.Patients with secondary Parkinsonism

4.Severe cognitive dysfunction such that the relevant questionnaires for assessment cannot be undertaken by the patient

5. Refusal to give consent for the study

The study was conducted after getting approval by the medical ethics committee at Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi, India and written informed consent from all patients. Diagnosis of PD was made as per the UK Brain Bank criteria. (11) Demographic data were collected, history and examination were done for all recruited patients. Patients were divided into 2 categories, PD and Parkinson plus syndrome. Patients with Parkinson plus syndrome were further sub-classified into Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), Corticobasal Degeneration (CBD), Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) and Dementia with Lewy Body (DLB) as per NINDS-SPSP clinical criteria for the diagnosis of PSP, Proposed research criteria for CBD, Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of MSA and latest consensus diagnostic criteria for DLB respectively. (12-15) Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale UPDRS Part-III and Modified Hoehn & Yahr staging were used for severity assessment of PD. Evaluation of cognition was done by using SCOPA-COG (Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease-Cognition). The psychiatric and behavioral disorder was assessed by BDI (Beck Depression Inventory) and NPI (Neuropsychiatric Inventory). (16) Sleep problems were assessed by the Parkinson’s disease Sleep Scale (PDSS). For autonomic dysfunction, SCOPA-AUT (Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease- Autonomic) was used. From all these score composite scores was calculated and based on the score NMS were categorized from no symptoms to severe symptoms. Pain assessment was done by a visual analog scale.


Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software for the variables under study. The correlation of the presence of NMS with severity and duration of disease was done by using appropriate statistical tests. Statistical significance level was considered at a p-value <0.05.


Results

A total of  60 patients with Parkinson’s disease and Parkinson's plus syndrome were recruited in the study. Out of which 40 were Parkinson’s disease (PD) and 20 were Parkinson plus syndrome. In 20 patients of Parkinson plus syndrome, 9 were multiple system atrophy (MSA), 8 were progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), 3 dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and no patient of corticobasal degeneration (CBD) was present.


Table-1: Baseline characteristics of patients

Table 2: Different NMS Scores of patients


Different scores were obtained and compared between PD and Parkinson plus syndrome. There was no statistically significant correlation between cognition, depression, and sleep in between PD and Parkinson plus Syndrome. The pain was more common in PD than Parkinson plus Syndrome (p=0.006), whereas autonomic dysfunction was more common in Parkinson plus Syndrome than PD (p=0.041).

Table 3 Comparison of different score among Parkinsonian disorders.


Based on this data, depression, pain, sleep, autonomic dysfunction were found to be significantly related to the duration of PD whereas no significant relation was found with Parkinson plus syndromes. Depression, pain, sleep and autonomic symptoms were significantly associated with the severity of PD.


Discussion

NMS is common in Parkinson’s disease (PD), but often under-recognized in clinical practice because of the lack of spontaneous complaints by the patients, and also the absence of systematic questioning by health care professionals. They can even precede the motor symptoms or signs by several years and then herald the onset of PD. A previous Indian study found a correlation between non-motor and motor symptoms in the disease progression, particularly cognitive impairment, autonomic dysfunction and anosmia. (17) Fatigue, pain, sleep-related problems, autonomic dysfunction and cognitive impairment are common NMS in PD as per recent Indian studies. (18,19)

In our study, cognitive impairment was observed in 9 (22.5%) patients based on the SCOPA-COG scale. In our study, no correlation was found between cognitive impairment with duration and severity of disease in PD. Earlier estimates of the prevalence of dementia in Parkinson’s disease have been highly variable, ranging from 20% to 81%. (20) This might be due to different assessment techniques and different study populations. Aarsland D et al. (2010) reported cognitive impairment in over 25% of PD patients and Emre M. (2003) reported dementia in up to 40%. (21,22) In patients with Parkinson plus syndrome cognitive impairment was reported in 40–62% of patients with progressive supranuclear palsy and 11–32% of patients with multiple system atrophy by Brown RG et al. (2010). (23) Another study on PSP reported a similar percentage of cognitive impairment as in our study. Brusa et al. reported that about 52% of progressive supranuclear palsy patients experience cognitive symptoms. (24) Joseph and Dickson (2003) reported dementia in 10% and ‘cognitive complaints’ in 32% progressive supranuclear palsy cases. (25) Mood disorders in PD consist primarily of depression and anxiety, but can also include psychosis and apathy. (26) Anxiety disorders, including generalized anxiety disorder, agoraphobia, panic disorder, and social phobia, have all been reported in PD, with a prevalence of 20% - 40%. (27,28) We also noted 40% of our PD patients suffer from moderate to severe depression, and around 10% of these patients had delusion similar to a previous study by Aarsland et al. who reported 10% of Parkinson’s disease patients had hallucination with insight retained and another 6% had a more severe hallucination or delusion. (21) In our study, 20 (50%) PD patients had disturbed sleep on PDSS; sleep problems had a significant correlation with duration and severity of disease in PD. Previous studies have reported similar findings related to sleep problems in PD. (29,30) Sleep-related problems were present in 11 (55%) patients of Parkinson Plus Syndrome in our study, with sleep fragmentation, and insomnia being commonly reported. In our study 35 (87.50%) 

PD patients had autonomic dysfunction, mostly in the form of sialorrhea, constipation, and abdominal fullness. Visser et al. (2004) reported autonomic disturbance in 14%-80%, and these symptoms are better evaluated with the SCOPA-AUT Scale. (31) Martignoni E et al. (1995) reported that the autonomic features vary considerably from 2% for urinary incontinence to 72% for constipation. (32) In our study, the prevalence of autonomic dysfunction in Parkinson Plus syndrome patients was found to be high but there was no significant correlation of autonomic dysfunction with duration (p=0.190) and severity of the disease. Wolters et al. (2008) reported that autonomic dysfunction is closely associated with MSA, but nearly all Parkinsonian patients experience some degree of autonomic disturbances during their illness. (33)


Conclusion

NMS has a great impact on the quality of life, but nonrecognition of NMS is a common problem, requiring a systematic approach to both diagnosis and treatment. Many useful questionnaires might be used to detect and guide the management of NMS. Non-motor symptoms in PD are usually more complicated and difficult to manage than typical PD motor symptoms. We also noted a variety of NMS in patients with Parkinsonism and their progression with duration and severity of the disease. Timely assessment and management of these symptoms along with motor symptoms may improve the quality of life, thus bringing satisfaction in life.


References

1.Przedborski S. Etiology and pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. In: Jankovic J, Tolosa E, eds. Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2007; 77-92.

2.Parkinson J. “An essay on the shaking palsy”. London: Sherwood, Neely and Jones 1817.

3.Chaudhuri KR, Martinez-Martin P, Brown RG, Sethi K, Stocchi F, Odin P, et al. “The metric properties of a novel non-motor symptoms scale for Parkinson’s disease: results from an international pilot study”. Mov Disord 2007; 22:1901-11.

4.Behari M. “Treatment of Parkinson’s disease: fighting the surging enemy”. Neurol India 1999; 47:259-62.

5.K. R. Chaudhuri, D. Healy, and A. H. V. Shapira, “The non motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease NMS Quest. Diagnosis and management,” The Lancet Neurology.  2006; 5: 235–45.

6.P. Barone, A. Antonini, C. Colosimo et al., “The PRIAMO study: a multicenter assessment of nonmotor symptoms and their impact on quality of life in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders. 2009; 24:1641–9.

7.Richard IH, Schiffer RB, Kurlan R. Anxiety and Parkinson’s disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neuroscience 1996; 8:383-92.

8.Walsh K, Bennett G. Parkinson’s disease and Anxiety. Postgrad Med J 2001; 77:89-93.

9.Nissenbaum H, Quinn NP, Brown RG. “Mood swings associated with the ‘on-off’ phenomenon in Parkinson’s disease, a register based study”. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1987; 17:899-904.

10.Witjas T, Kaphan E, Azulay JP. “Non-motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease: Frequent and disabling”. Neurology 2002; 59:408-13.

11.Hughes AJ, Ben-Shlomo Y, Daniel SE, Lees AJ. “What features improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in Parkinson’s disease: a clinicopathologic study”. Neurology 1992; 42:1142–46.

12.Litvan I, Agid Y, Calne D, et al. “Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome): report of the NINDS-SPSP international workshop”. Neurology 1996; 47:1-9.

13.Kumar R, Bergeron C, Pollanen MS, Lang AE. “Cortical basal ganglionic degeneration. In: Jankovic J, Tolosa E, editors. “Parkinson’s disease and movement   disorders”. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1998; 297–316.

14.GilmanS, Wenning GK, Low et al (2008) “Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of MSA”. Neurology 71:670-76.

15.Mc Keith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J et al (2005) “Diagnosis and management of   dementia with lewy bodies: third report of the LBD consortium”. Neurology 65:1863-72.

16.Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG J. "Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory Twenty-five years of evaluation". Clin. Psych. Review 1988; 8: 77-100.

17.Ravan A, Ahmad FM, Chabria S, Gadhari M, Sankhla CS. “Non-motor symptoms in an Indian cohort of Parkinson's disease patients and correlation of progression of non-motor symptoms with motor worsening Neurol India”. 2015;63:166-74.

18.Pappala K, Garuda BR, Seepana G, Thalabaktula SK, Uppaturi AK. “Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: it’s prevalence across various stages And it’s correlation with the severity of the disease and quality of life”. Ann Mov Disord 2019;2:102-8.

19.Karri M,   Ramasamy B, Kalidoss R. “Prevalence of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease and its impact on Quality of Life in Tertiary Care Center in India”. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2020.

20.Martinez-Martin P, Visser M, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Marinus J, Chaudhuri KR, van Hilten JJ: “SCOPA-sleep and PDSS: two scales for assessment of sleep disorder in Parkinson’s disease”. Mov Disord 2008; 23:1681–88.

21.D. Aarsland, J. Zaccai, and C. Brayne. “A systematic review of prevalence studies of dementia in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, 2005; 20(10):1255–63.

22.Emre M. “Dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease”. Lancet Neurol 2003; 2:229-37.

23.Brown RG, Lacomblez L, Landwehrmeyer BG, Bak T, Uttner I, Dubois B, Agid Y, Ludolph A, Bensimon G, Payan C, Leigh NP; NNIPPS Study Group. “Cognitive impairment in patients with multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy”. Brain. 2010; 133:2382-93.

24.Brusa A, Mancardi GL, Bugiani O. “Progressive supranuclear palsy 1979: an overview”. Ital J Neurol Sci 1980; 1: 205–22.

25.Josephs KA, Dickson DW. “Diagnostic accuracy of progressive supranuclear palsy in the Society for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy brain bank”. Mov Disord 2003; 18: 1018–26.

26.Tan LC. “Mood disorders in Parkinson's disease”. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012; 18 (1):S74-6.

27.Simuni T, Sethi K. “Nonmotor manifestations of Parkinson’s disease”. Ann Neurol 2008; 64(2):S65–80.

28.Martinez-Martin P, Schapira AH, Stocchi F, et al. “Prevalence of nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease in an international setting; study using nonmotor symptoms questionnaire in 545 patients”. Mov Disord 2007; 22(11):1623–9.

29.Tandberg E et al, “A community based study of sleep disorders in patients of Parkinson’s disease”, Mov Disord, 1998, 13:895-99.

30.Behari M et al “Sleep disorders in Parkinson's disease”. Movement Disorders 2002; 17(4): 775–81.

31.Visser M, Marinus J, Stiggelbout AM, van Hilten JJ. “Assessment of autonomic dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: The SCOPA- AUT”. Mov Disord 2004; 19(11):1306-12.

32.Martignoni E, Micieli G, Cavallini A, et al.: “Autonomic disorders in idiopathic Parkinsonism”. J Neural Transm 1986, 22:149–161.

33.Walter U, Tsiberidou P,Kersten M, Storch A, Lohle M. “Atrophy of the vagus nerve in Parkinson's Disease revealed by high-resolution ultrasonography”. Front. Neurol.2018:9; 805-7.

 

Volume 2 Issue 1 February 2021

©All rights reserved by Dr. Kuljeet Singh Anand

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

antarmuka fokus mahjong daya pengguna aktifaws grid serasi mahjong dasar tahapan terjagaaws jejak mekanisme mahjong arah fase lanjutanaws kajian wild berantai mahjong interaktif analitisaws kesesuaian persentase layanan mahjong seluler lanceraws pendalaman persentase mahjong gerak wild mutakhircorak langka mahjong tumbuh perlahan berubahgerak mahjong adaptasi mekanisme pemakai sekarangnalar scatter mahjong malam putaran ekstratempo mahjong kaitan mekanisme keadaan terkinialur permainan mahjong cepat scatter wilddalam hitungan detik scatter wild mahjongmenyatukan naluri pola scatter hitam mahjongmomen mahjong permainan berbalik arahmomen singkat mahjong dinamika permainanperpaduan insting pola scatter hitam momentperubahan drastis mahjong ways scatter wildscatter wild mahjong datang polasekejap berubah scatter wild mahjong wayssensasi baru mahjong lebih scatter wildenergi scatter emas irama reel mahjongevolusi reel mahjong balutan mistisintervensi cepat emas momentum lamakemunculan mendadak naga emas mahjongketika scatter naga emas aktif mahjongnaga emas muncul arah spin mahjongnaga emas ritme mahjong ways berubahrahasia rtp tinggi balik scatter hitamsaat scatter naga emas alih irama reelscatter hitam kunci lonjakan rtp mahjonge5 scatter wild memberikan sentuhan baru di setiap spin mahjong ways 2e5 scatter wild menghidupkan suasana permainan mahjong ways 2e5 scatter wild mengubah pola permainan mahjong ways 2 secara signifikane5 setiap putaran mahjong ways 2 terasa berbeda dengan scatter wilde5 strategi adaptif berbasis analisis rtp hariane5 strategi berbasis data dan algoritma untuk analisis momentume5 strategi berkembang berkat data rtp hariane5 strategi memahami algoritma untuk mengidentifikasi momentum ideale5 strategi membaca pola algoritma demi menangkap momentum optimale5 strategi modern mengandalkan evaluasi rtp hariane5 strategi responsif dengan dukungan evaluasi rtp hariane5 strategi terukur dengan analisis rtp hariane5 struktur scatter dan wild terlihat jelas berkat analisis sistem moderne5 tanpa disadari kombinasi ini sering mengarah ke scatter di mahjong wins 3e5 teknik evaluasi algoritma untuk mendapatkan momentum yang tepate5 teknik observasi sistem untuk analisis momentum yang lebih presisie5 terungkap formasi ini sering jadi awal munculnya scatter di mahjong wins 3e5 transformasi digital rtp live berkat artificial intelligence inovatife5 transformasi ritme mahjong ways 2 dipicu oleh kekuatan scatter wilde5 wajib tahu pola tersembunyi ini sering menghasilkan scattere5 applee5 bananae5 candye5 doge5 eaglee5 falcone5 geminie5 horsee5 indiae5 japananalisa pola mahjong ways rutinanalisis kinerja heuristik variansi gameanalisis pola mahjong ways hariananalisis pola mahjong ways kebiasaanera baru mahjong wins bonus optimalgebrakan bonus mahjong wins mekanisme efisieninsight pola mahjong ways rutinkajian pola mahjong ways rutinkomparasi heuristik variansi game digitalledakan bonus mahjong wins sistem efektifmahjong wins bonus sistem generasi baruobservasi pola mahjong ways harianpendekatan algoritma heuristik variansi gameperbandingan model heuristik variansi gamerahasia bonus mahjong wins sistem cerdasrangkuman pola mahjong ways harianringkasan pola mahjong ways harianstudi pola mahjong ways hariantinjauan heuristik variansi game digitaltinjauan pola mahjong ways harianalur sombol mahjong kemunculan scatterdari rtp mahjong bermain lebih efektifjejak scatter mahjong putaran tenangkejutan scatter wild simbol mahjong arahkemunculan simbol ganda membuat mahjongketika grid mahjong scatter semakin dekatketika rtp mahjong pola mulai lebih jelasketika scatter wild ritme simbol mahjongketika scatter wild titik sesi mahjong waysketika susunan simbol mahjong ritme scattermemahami rtp mahjong cara bermain lebihpergerakan simbol mahjong scatter wildpergeseran mahjong ketika scatter hadirsaat rtp mahjong terbaca baik strategisaat scatter hadir simbol mahjong bergeserscatter wild dinamika simbol mahjongstabilitas putaran mahjong pola scattersusunan baru reel mahjong scatter emassusunan mahjong wins mengandung scattersusunan simbol mahjong diam pola scatterrm menguak keunikan mahjong wins sudut pandang teknisrm cara memahami pergerakan mahjong ways tenaga ekstrarm mahjong wins standar baru industri hiburan digitalrm rahasia ketahanan mahjong ways eksis gempuran gamerm pentingnya memahami transisi level mahjong wins mendalamrm strategi mengatur tempo mahjong ways kendali permainanrm peran kecerdasan buatan mekanisme mahjong wins adilrm alasan keberhasilan mahjong ways mencuri perhatian analisrm mempelajari struktur dasar mahjong wins efisiensi putaranrm inovasi desain mahjong ways kesan bermain responsifrm teknik observasi mahjong wins jarang dibahas dampakrm cara mempertahankan fokus dinamika mahjong ways cepatrm eksplorasi fitur tersembunyi mahjong wins ritme terbaikrm mahjong ways integrasi teknologi modern keamanan nyamanrm analisis faktor pendukung mahjong wins digemari generasirm langkah efektif menyesuaikan perubahan sistem mahjong waysrm mengintip proses pengembangan mahjong wins kualitas penggunarm analisis data membantu membaca arah mahjong waysrm menemukan titik temu insting logika mahjong winsrm transformasi besar mahjong ways menghadirkan tantangan menarikmengungkap simbol langka nasib drastismisteri besar kombinasi simbol langkamisteri simbol langka keberuntungan besarsimbol langka misterius ubah hiduprahasia simbol langka nasib cepattransformasi bonus mahjong wins sistem efektifmahjong wins suguhkan bonus sistem modernsuguhan bonus efisien mahjong winsefektivitas sistem bonus mahjong winsmahjong wins hadirkan bonus sistem optimaloke76cincinbetaqua365slot gacorstc76samurai76TOBA1131samurai76 login